Three Articles that Respond to A&E’s Decision to Suspend Phil Robertson from Duck Dynasty

By now you’ve probably heard that the A&E Network has suspended Phil Robertson indefinitely from the reality show, Duck Dynasty, due to comments he made in a recent GQ article. You can read the original article here, What the Duck?

News of this has been trending since last night with lots of reactions to A&E’s decision. There are more than a few opinions on this matter, Google returned “about 62,400,000 results” in 0.26 seconds. Here are 3 articles supporting Phil Robertson that you might want to read:

Your turn… What are some other reactions you’ve read to this news? What are your thoughts on the matter?

 

 

Advertisements

3 Comments

Filed under Articles

3 responses to “Three Articles that Respond to A&E’s Decision to Suspend Phil Robertson from Duck Dynasty

  1. Danny Gill

    Phil Robertson said nothing that’s wrong or hateful. And yet GLAAD says he’s “spreading lies.” What lies? He called sin what it is. But for being politically incorrect, he’s “suspended” from a TV show. It’s political correctness gone mad.

  2. Pingback: An Evaluation of the A&E vs. Phil Robertson (Duck Dynasty) Debacle | Adventures of a Communications Major

  3. Pingback: Three More Articles Responding to the Duck Dynasty Headlines | ResourcesForUs

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s